Accountancy cannot be a mess.

In fact, “Accountancy, at its heart, is all about neatness. It is about of symmetry. It is about double-entry. It is about balancing things out. It breeds a feeling of control. The figures neatly agree. All is well with the world. Job done.”

This is the first paragraph from the article entitled “stay focused” by Mr Robert Bruce. It really wowed me with its simplicity and yet so encapsulating.

As accountants, are we always looking to put various transactions in different “boxes” quickly and efficiently, so that we can pass entries, balance our books and go home?

Mr Bruce also took a swipe at the auditors when he said, “Diligent auditors follow screen-by-screen, ticking all boxes, and then fold up the laptops and go home.”

He said the neatness give all of us a feeling that the job is done. But in fact it may not be and we could end up being at home for months after being fired for not doing our job. So Mr Bruce advised that we should tossed everything up in the air and watched how they come down to earth ie. undo the neatness!

Cheers to you, Mr Bruce. Interesting stuff.

CFOs, this is your job description.

P/S – a painting
Keith Stephenson, the advisory partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers and Asia Pacific leader of performance improvement came up with the list in an article written by Sonia Kolesnikov-Jessop of A&B.
  1. Complying with reporting requirements.
  2. Ensure no surprises.
  3. Getting the audit committee to give you a thumb up on your general standard of corporate governance.
  4. Get yourself to move from being a guardian of numbers to the frontline of generating shareholder value.
  5. Managing movement offshore.

There is a need for a CFO to move up the value chain, staying relevant and keeping pace with business development as rallied by Lim Yen Suan, executive director of KPMG’s Risk Advisory Service.

Is the general lack of such movement giving rise t0 a trend of non-accountants taking on the role of CFOs?

Revaluation surplus and tax issues with Yeo Hiap Seng

What is the issue?
Yeo Hiap Seng (YHS) said the revaluation surpluses ($215.3mio) accumulated for several pieces of land it owned are not taxable gain and has not made any tax provision.

PricewaterhourseCoopers, its auditors, has signed off on the accounts for the year ended Dec 31, 2006 while highlighting the “discrepancy” in the audit report.

The Inland Revenue authority (IRAS) has, expressed its disagreement with that position. It is currently reviewing the information submitted by YHS.

Further Explanation
YHS has chosen to make no provisions for tax liability on revaluation surpluses of $128.8 million and $86.5 million, on its tax counsel’s advice that they are capital accretion.

The Sterling / Gardenvista – condominium developments
Prior to obtaining the developer’s licence in Apr 1997, I presume that YHS would be saying that it was holding the land as long term investment or for its own use given F&B as its main business.

Only after Apr 1997, YHS, with the developer’s licence, is now officially in the property development business.

Thus any appreciation in the value of the lands it was holding prior to that date would go to Revaluation Reserve account. Thus YHS’s position that $215.3mio revaluation surplus is deemed not taxable.

In 2004, however, the IRAS said some revaluation surpluses may not be considered capital accretion. In Feb 2006, IRAS repeated that part of YHS’s $128.8 million surplus would not be considered capital accretion. It asked YHS for more information so that it could update its assessments. YHS made submissions to IRAS on June 9.

Mr Kaka Singh – ACCA Members Forum

Hi friends,

Wish to share the highlights of today’s forum at M Hotel with Mr Kaka Singh, the immediate past President of ACCA Local council in Singapore.

He said once there were too many doctors and lawyers, now we are short of them. Then there were many people producing only on 2 children, now we are short of people in Singapore. He was responding to a question from a member who expressed his concern that ACCA as a desired qualification may be eroded given the high membership level of about 5,000 ACCA members and 3,000 affiliates.

Mr Singh noted a uniqueness of ACCA programme when he related this story. He attended the graduation for ACCA students and met a doctor who went through and graduated. Mr Singh asked why he needed to go through the programme. The doctor said the ACCA programme allowed him to gain competence in dealing with numbers in his job as an administrator of a hospital.

  • The ACCA programme is the only avenue in Singapore that provides working adults and mid career individuals the opportunity to secure an a recognised financial training qualification part time.

CPD programmes under ACCA Singapore are priced on a cost recovery basis.

Mr Kaka’s final words today – “How good you are will depend on how prepare you are.”

P/S – Mr Kaka Singh is standing as a candidate for election to ACCA council in UK. Please give our support to him to ensure Singapore’s voice in international forum.

Return on Equity & Creditors’ Turnover in days

P/S – This is my feel.

Hi,

Just completed my lecture on financial ratios & interpretations recently. Two stories related to the topic were sent to me. I wish to share them with you.

The first story from Paul. He said,
“Hi Edgar, I thought this was particularly relevant to what you have mentioned in your last class with regards to inventory ratios. Interesting to relate this to everyday news, especially in Singapore context. Paul”

Paul cited Daniel Buenas’s report that most S’pore companies are tardy paymasters and are worse paymasters than companies in China, Australia, Hong Kong and Taiwan. 52 per cent consistently late with their payments from a study done on 1,000 firms from 6 countries by Dun and Bradstreet (D&B).

Only 33 per cent of companies here were ‘prompt’ in their payments, which is defined as ‘consistently paying within the credit terms given to a business’.

The second story in today’s Busines Times said Singapore firms are among the Asia-Pacific region’s top companies by return on equity (ROE). This is according to a Dun & Bradstreet’s (D&B) study released yesterday.

Of the 1,000 companies ranked in the study, Singapore firms ie. Starhub Mobile and APL, Neptune Orient Lines’s subsidiary, took second and fourth places respectively.

StarHub Mobile recorded an ROE of 1,019.3 per cent. The fourth placed Neptune Orient Lines subsidiary APL achieved a 935.2 per cent ROE.

Wow! Amazing….

Why we should kill off "estate duty" asap?

The reasons for abolishing the estate duty are:-

  1. Together with income tax, GST and estate duty, it is a triple whammy for taxpayers. You are subject to tax from the first day of work till one’s last day on earth.
  2. We have a lopsided exemption limit of $600,000 for movable assets against exemption up to $9mio for residential property. This lopsidedness would ensnare many middle-income households to be liable for estate duty.
  3. Will the existence of the estate duty discourage wealthy retirees to settle in Singapore? Maybe. Maybe not. If the tax revenue from this source is relatively insignificant, why risk it?

Why Govt’s hesitation to remove the tax?

  • Allow me to speculate.
  • The Govt could be due to collect some real monies from the estates of tycoon Khoo Teck Puat and ex-OUB banker Lien Ying Chow. While last year’s estate duty collection maybe a “mere peanut” amount of $80mio, the coming years of rapidly aging Singapore should “help” to raise the collection figures on this front.
  • Alternatively, the Govt could be too busy to dedicate resources to review this area that affect only a minority but the very rich few.

SME Accounting Standards

Hi,

I am looking to form a small team of people to review and comment where applicable on the proposed standards.

CCDG is inviting for comment from public. Due date – Sep 1, 2007.

If you are interested in participating in the democratic process of accounting standard formulation and at the same time, learning something together, please drop me a note to indicate your interest.

Good day…

Hurray!!! Simpler SME accounting standard coming

The CCDG announced the new standard for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) last month and is seeking comments from the public.

The proposed rules closely relate to the new SME financial reporting standards put forward by the UK-based International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in February.

What are some of the proposed changes highlighted?

  • Choices for accounting treatment have been removed and topics that are not generally relevant to SMEs, such as share-based payments and segment reporting, have been cut.
  • Methods for recognition and measurement have also been simplified. For example, for goodwill impairment, SMEs can use an indicator approach rather than an annual impairment test.

What are the potential impacts?

  • CCDG expects the current volume of accounting standards for SMEs to be cut by more than 85 per cent.
  • The auditors are looking at 10-15% reduction in audit fees. But is it fair? We will wait and see till at least after the first done under the new rules possibly end of next year.

The proposed rules are now opened for your comment till Sep 1, 2007.

I am delighted by the news as this would help to ease the frustration I experienced recently in dealing with some fellow professionals. Story about this in my next article.

Loss Carry Back System

What was then?
Companies can either carry forward their unutilised capital allowances (CAs) and trade losses to offset future incomes (i.e. loss carry-forward) or transfer these unutilised CAs and trade losses to offset profit in related companies as part of group relief.

What was wrong?
These schemes may not provide adequate or timely support to smaller businesses that run into cash flow problems, particularly during a cyclical downturn.

What is the solution?
Starting YA 2006, a one-year carry-back of current year unutilised CAs and trade losses will be introduced.

The main features of the scheme are:

a) Only current year unutilised CAs and trade losses will be allowed to be carried back for one YA immediately preceding the YA in which the CAs were granted or the trade losses incurred.

b) Up to $100,000 of current year unutilised CAs and trade losses can be carried back.

c) The carry-back system will be available to all businesses, including sole proprietors and partnerships.

d) The current requirements for carry-forward of unutilised CAs and trade losses will similarly apply when these amounts are carried back i.e. no substantial change in shareholding and nature of business.

A blanket exemption for estate duty?

To minimise estate duty – invest in residential real estate given the exemption granted for value up to $9mio – was the advice given in last week’s article.

This is a heavy weightage on property as an asset class. Why? To encourage home ownership? To encourage you to stay in Singapore or to discourage you from leaving? To hold up property prices? Don’t think so.

Tan Peng Boon, in today’s Sunday Times, suggested a blanket exemption of up to $9.6mio in term of all assets instead of the current sublimits applied on residential properties and other assets.

Perhaps this is a convenient compromise for the government to hold on to this tax for a few more years.