The info presented here and as always is, is to help to raise awareness of things surrounding you. This is also part of the training to review financial statements.
How much did ICPAS receive from its members?
Answer – It received $2.7mio (a drop of 3.6% against 2005) from its members.
How much surplus did SAA, the training arm of ICPAS, generate in 2006?
Answer – Despite having generated a healthy surplus of $1.9mio, it has declined significantly by 16% compared to 2005.
What is the overall bottomline then?
Answer – On the whole, ICPAS registered $1.5mio surplus (a negative 34% against 2005). The significant drop in surplus could be due to:-
- higher expenditure in marketing & promotion activities and;
- more than three-fold increase in deficit in the Practice Monitoring Division
Administrative expenses grew 25% to $4.07mio for 2006.
The most significant activity in 2006 which impacted ICPAS’s cashflow was the acquisition of City Campus for $15mio.
- Cash and cash equivalents declined from $7.8mio to $2.2mio.
- ICPAS entered into a finance lease position of $8mio.
Should you wish to review the full financial statements, you may approach the institute.
In this posting, I attempt to BRIEFLY explain the main intention of all these changes.
In one sentence – ACCA intends to hard implant key values ie. professional values, ethics and governance into all aspiring members-to-be.
These skills are essential as the profession moves towards strengthened codes of conduct, regulation and legislation with an increasing focus on professionalism and ethics in accounting.
They will be examined at every subject (where applicable, with different emphasis) till the highest level in the new ACCA Qualification. They will also be a core element of students’ practical experience requirements. This point was stressed repeatedly in the recent lecturers’ briefing.
The intent is demonstrated by the creation of the compulsory online practical Ethics module for all new students.
The focus on ethics is not uncommon. It is a singular subject to be passed in the CFA programme. Given the many accounting blow ups in the recent years, I don’t think we are doing enough yet.
There are a few requests for me to give some attention to the new ACCA programme. So this is the first of my series.
What is the name of new programme?
Answer – Boringly and amazingly obviously called – “ACCA Qualification“.
The programme was officially unveiled in Jan 2006 for implementation for Dec 2007 exams. That effectively crystallised the effort started back in Nov 2004.
Still the same number of 14 subjects but with significant change in the content of the respective subjects. It will change so much that you will NOT be able to correspond 1 from the old programme with another from the new programme. Example – Paper 2.1.
There is also the online Professional ethics module for new intake students to complete. I was briefed that they will actually track the time you spend on going through the module. Not compulsory for existing students. But you are encourage to do it.
In fact, “Accountancy, at its heart, is all about neatness. It is about of symmetry. It is about double-entry. It is about balancing things out. It breeds a feeling of control. The figures neatly agree. All is well with the world. Job done.”
This is the first paragraph from the article entitled “stay focused” by Mr Robert Bruce. It really wowed me with its simplicity and yet so encapsulating.
As accountants, are we always looking to put various transactions in different “boxes” quickly and efficiently, so that we can pass entries, balance our books and go home?
Mr Bruce also took a swipe at the auditors when he said, “Diligent auditors follow screen-by-screen, ticking all boxes, and then fold up the laptops and go home.”
He said the neatness give all of us a feeling that the job is done. But in fact it may not be and we could end up being at home for months after being fired for not doing our job. So Mr Bruce advised that we should tossed everything up in the air and watched how they come down to earth ie. undo the neatness!
Cheers to you, Mr Bruce. Interesting stuff.
P/S – a painting
Keith Stephenson, the advisory partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers and Asia Pacific leader of performance improvement came up with the list in an article written by Sonia Kolesnikov-Jessop of A&B.
- Complying with reporting requirements.
- Ensure no surprises.
- Getting the audit committee to give you a thumb up on your general standard of corporate governance.
- Get yourself to move from being a guardian of numbers to the frontline of generating shareholder value.
- Managing movement offshore.
There is a need for a CFO to move up the value chain, staying relevant and keeping pace with business development as rallied by Lim Yen Suan, executive director of KPMG’s Risk Advisory Service.
Is the general lack of such movement giving rise t0 a trend of non-accountants taking on the role of CFOs?
What is the issue?
Yeo Hiap Seng (YHS) said the revaluation surpluses ($215.3mio) accumulated for several pieces of land it owned are not taxable gain and has not made any tax provision.
PricewaterhourseCoopers, its auditors, has signed off on the accounts for the year ended Dec 31, 2006 while highlighting the “discrepancy” in the audit report.
The Inland Revenue authority (IRAS) has, expressed its disagreement with that position. It is currently reviewing the information submitted by YHS.
YHS has chosen to make no provisions for tax liability on revaluation surpluses of $128.8 million and $86.5 million, on its tax counsel’s advice that they are capital accretion.
The Sterling / Gardenvista – condominium developments
Prior to obtaining the developer’s licence in Apr 1997, I presume that YHS would be saying that it was holding the land as long term investment or for its own use given F&B as its main business.
Only after Apr 1997, YHS, with the developer’s licence, is now officially in the property development business.
Thus any appreciation in the value of the lands it was holding prior to that date would go to Revaluation Reserve account. Thus YHS’s position that $215.3mio revaluation surplus is deemed not taxable.
In 2004, however, the IRAS said some revaluation surpluses may not be considered capital accretion. In Feb 2006, IRAS repeated that part of YHS’s $128.8 million surplus would not be considered capital accretion. It asked YHS for more information so that it could update its assessments. YHS made submissions to IRAS on June 9.